| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #11 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 224
| Tim you need to respond to this serious criticism and not make jokes. Is there a problem with Pwnboxer that makes it respond erratically in a mixed classes environment? Are you looking into the problem? I'm beginning to wonder if you're even working on Pwnboxer anymore, is there an update upcoming? The last one was when, six months ago?
__________________ |
| |
| | #12 |
| Administrator Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: USA
Posts: 6,767
| I did respond to the sample configuration file question, but let me respond directly to yours. Q: Is there a problem with Pwnboxer that makes it respond erratically in a mixed classes environment? A: Pwnboxer really cares less about anything going on in the game. It doesn't care if you're 5 Warlocks, 5 Turtles, or 1 of each class dancing at the mailbox. Pwnboxer is developed to function very, very gently, which ensures that it will always be complaint with generally accepted multiboxing rules, which allows it to separate itself clearly from programs which otherwise can be used to automate/bot gameplay. Pwnboxer literally has no ability to know anything about what is going on in the game. All it does is run key/mouse routines through its broadcasting engine and output key/mouse commands. Toss in a few things like a very easy to use UI, cpu/graphic managing aspects, and a few other bells and whistles, and that is basically it. Could Pwnboxer read WoW memory to determine your class and provide some extra bells/whistles? Heck yea I could add that, and it wouldn't really be hard at all. However, things like that are highly frowned upon, and even seen as illegal in the eyes of Blizzard and the court system of the US. So unless diving deeper into WoW's internal structure is seen as acceptable by Blizzard and/or US Law, then Pwnboxer will remain unaggressive in its function and protective of its users. I'm sure some people will want to use other softwares that do just that, which is why its so great that we live in a free society. But my stance is and will always be to go the safer route, even if it makes less $$. I care not about $$ if I have to put in danger Pwnboxer's users. I'm not here to fleece people for cash and put them at risk. |
| |
| | #13 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 224
| So what's all this talk about Pwnboxer not working as intended? And why haven't you updated Pwnboxer in so long? Are you still working on improving your software?
__________________ |
| |
| | #14 |
| Administrator Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: USA
Posts: 6,767
| By "all this talk" are you referring to yourself? Lets keep things constructive please. Going to close this thread now that the questions have been answered. If you have a comment about an issue, or have a request for something to add, please start up a new constructive thread. |
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Anyone good with DOS batch files? | TheMuffinMan | Off Topic | 1 | 02-10-2010 09:59 AM |
| Looking for a good benchmark program | Nghtmr9999 | Multiboxing Computer Hardware | 6 | 09-30-2009 02:30 AM |
| need more than one wow program to multibox? | dun | Multiboxing Computer Hardware | 10 | 08-27-2009 10:28 PM |
| Question about another program | JU1CYFRU1T | Multiboxing Software | 2 | 07-28-2009 12:48 PM |
| Request : How to make a video from Fraps recorded files | Nebulus | Multiboxing Videos | 7 | 07-21-2009 04:15 AM |