| | #1 |
| Administrator Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: USA
Posts: 6,768
| Hey guys, Quick question: If I integrated free tunneling access for WoW traffic directly into Pwnboxer as an option (typically you will pay $30-$80 a year for this), would you guys use it? I suppose this would be targeted more towards the non-USA multiboxers interested in playing on US servers with low ping times. Would any of you guys be interested in this? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 224
| I don't get it, how would using "tunneling" allow lower ping? Since the player would still be in Europe (or wherever), how would that make the connection better to the US servers? |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member | This be great when i tryed demo acconts Each time i tryed to enter org it would DC me Big time follow would not work the chars would be to far behind even though i long had a 460ms ping i had more on EU at times the time it would take for the server to come back to my pc and from pc to computer it would die ill be a crash test dummey tim
__________________ |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 23
| I have been using pwnboxer with wowtunnels for ever and it work fantastic. all you have to do is setup the path for all the wows to use it, ie I use proxycap with wowtunnels and its easy to setup for as many wows as you want . As also I contacted the owner of wowtunnels to check if it was ok to multibox with his service, he was fine with it, as im in Australia and I can run 5 wows all sitting under 200 ms constantly. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Administrator Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: USA
Posts: 6,768
| Guys do me a favor: Ping multiboxing.com then paste results Then ping worldofwarcraft.com then paste results Only for non-US people |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Senior Member | Last edited by Paul1337noob; 02-28-2010 at 06:19 AM. |
| | |
| | #7 | ||
| Senior Member | fire walls block pings ![]() Quote:
Quote:
__________________ Last edited by ebony; 02-28-2010 at 09:53 AM. | ||
| | |
| | #8 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 18
| Hi Tim, Very interested. Would simplify my setup as I currently use WoW Tunnels. Though it would have to be competative with WoW tunnel pings (though not nescasarily better) for me to switch: multiboxing.com worldofwarcraft.com C:\Users\solomani>tracert multiboxing.com Tracing route to multiboxing.com [173.160.101.149] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1 2 7 ms 9 ms 10 ms 61.4.14.254 3 12 ms 9 ms 10 ms 202.123.70.18 4 12 ms 9 ms 8 ms 202.123.92.2 5 13 ms 9 ms 9 ms 202-123-94-89.static.hdcdatacentre.com [202.123. 94.89] 6 9 ms 150 ms 16 ms 203.131.241.121 7 11 ms 10 ms 13 ms ae-6.r21.newthk01.hk.bb.gin.ntt.net [203.131.240 .126] 8 61 ms 64 ms 61 ms p64-4-1-1.r21.tokyjp01.jp.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.25 0.6.17] 9 171 ms 160 ms 167 ms as-0.r21.lsanca03.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.3.1 45] 10 173 ms 166 ms 151 ms as-1.r21.sttlwa01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.3.8 7] 11 154 ms 168 ms 155 ms po-1.r01.sttlwa01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.3.3 7] 12 172 ms 171 ms 374 ms xe-0.level3.sttlwa01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250. 9.162] 13 174 ms * 203 ms ae-11-51.car1.Seattle1.Level3.net [4.68.105.2] 14 179 ms 213 ms 209 ms pos-1-8-0-0-cr01.denver.co.ibone.comcast.net [68 .86.85.177] 15 227 ms 199 ms 232 ms te-9-4-ar02.roseville.mn.minn.comcast.net [68.86 .91.154] 16 233 ms 231 ms 237 ms te-0-1-0-2-ar01.roseville.mn.minn.comcast.net [6 8.87.174.213] 17 236 ms 223 ms 237 ms te-2-1-ur01.brooklynpark.mn.minn.comcast.net [68 .87.174.22] 18 227 ms 238 ms 228 ms te-8-3-ur02.brooklynpark.mn.minn.comcast.net [68 .87.174.26] 19 230 ms 223 ms 237 ms te-2-1-ur01.newhope.mn.minn.comcast.net [68.87.1 74.30] 20 236 ms 224 ms 236 ms te-8-3-ur02.newhope.mn.minn.comcast.net [68.87.1 74.34] 21 237 ms * 238 ms te-2-1-ur01.plymouth.mn.minn.comcast.net [68.87. 174.38] 22 224 ms 228 ms 225 ms te-2-1-ur01.plymouth.mn.minn.comcast.net [68.87. 174.38] 23 245 ms 244 ms 246 ms 68.85.166.186 24 255 ms 229 ms * 73.114.164.242 25 * * * Request timed out. 26 ^C C:\Users\solomani>tracert us.logon.worldofwarcraft.com Tracing route to us.logon.worldofwarcraft.com [12.129.224.110] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1 2 9 ms 9 ms 10 ms 61.4.14.254 3 10 ms 8 ms 9 ms 202.123.70.18 4 9 ms 8 ms 9 ms 202.123.92.2 5 8 ms 9 ms 9 ms 202-123-94-89.static.hdcdatacentre.com [202.123. 94.89] 6 13 ms 10 ms 9 ms 203.131.241.121 7 12 ms 10 ms 13 ms ae-6.r21.newthk01.hk.bb.gin.ntt.net [203.131.240 .126] 8 82 ms 64 ms 62 ms p64-4-1-1.r21.tokyjp01.jp.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.25 0.6.17] 9 166 ms 162 ms 164 ms as-2.r21.snjsca04.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.5.8 1] 10 163 ms 194 ms 169 ms ae-0.r20.snjsca04.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.2.9 6] 11 170 ms 164 ms 168 ms 192.205.33.177 12 167 ms * 175 ms cr1.sffca.ip.att.net [12.122.114.14] 13 167 ms 170 ms 177 ms cr1.la2ca.ip.att.net [12.122.3.122] 14 174 ms 177 ms 174 ms cr83.la2ca.ip.att.net [12.123.30.109] 15 174 ms 165 ms 173 ms gar5.la2ca.ip.att.net [12.122.128.25] 16 168 ms * 180 ms 12.122.255.74 17 174 ms 176 ms 173 ms 12.129.193.246 18 * * * Request timed out. 19 ^C All from HK with a middle of the range service (no optical fibre). Thanks. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Administrator Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: USA
Posts: 6,768
| Thanks for the info guys! I'm compiling it all together to help me pick some of the next things to go into Pwnboxer |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Any vBulletin skin designers in the house? Bounty offered!!! | Tim | General Discussions | 12 | 07-22-2011 08:57 PM |
| Lotro free!!! | p0weruser | General Discussions | 4 | 09-14-2010 07:13 AM |
| Buy Vanilla WoW ($19.99), get BC Free | Poyzon | General Discussions | 0 | 01-16-2010 02:02 PM |
| [Bounty of $100 offered] WTB Single HIGH quality flash banner! | Tim | General Discussions | 22 | 08-30-2009 09:18 AM |
| Bounty Offered!! Banner Request | Tim | General Discussions | 45 | 08-02-2009 04:16 PM |